jijiji
Berlín, 3 may (EFE).- "Cacería contra Messi. Pero Barcelona está en la final"
, titula en sus páginas deportivas el diario 
"Bild".
"In the band, swept Messi so heartless. (The referee Frank) De Bleeckere shown compassion and only shows yellow" , the paper said. Diarra, according to this medium, should also be expelled for a foul on Javier Masherano. "Bild". 
"Der Tagesspiegel", meanwhile, said that if Jose Mourinho had been on the bench would have nothing to complain against the referee and the only thing that can be criticized De Bleeckere is allowed Madrid finished the match with eleven players.
"Frank de Bleeckere forgave Ricardo Carvalho (violent despite five fouls in the first half against Messi), Marcelo (also fouled Messi) and Diarra (against Mascherano)"
, says the Berlin daily .
The "Berliner Zeitung", for his part, De Bleeckere of "compassionate referee."
"Although Carvalho was constantly begging to be shown the red card Bleeckere forgave him. So will a lack Marcelo expellable against Messi"
, the paper said. "It was as if to complete the ninety minutes with eleven players on the two equipment to prevent attacks tears of Jose Mourinho, "the newspaper said.
EFE
Was missing goal?
The last classic of the four who have played in only 18 days Barça and Madrid and it's over, how could it be otherwise, has made controversial. The means of Madrid, in general, charging the referee to justify the elimination of the white team. They argue that no There was missing from the controversial move of the match (that in which Christian, unbalanced earlier by Pique, Mascherano knocks). Beyond that the violation existed or not (we now discuss) what is abundantly clear (casting, for example, a look at the international press) is that this move was not determined for all the do not pass to the finals in Wembley whites. The Catalans played more and better (in global round) and so will be in London on 28th May.
We focus on the analysis and the play that, for many, especially from Madrid-marked the Classic on Tuesday. Above all, it is worth recalling that one can not refer to the time in question by the term "disallowed goal" (as many did and still continue to make). Basically, because when Higuain Pipita shoots and enter the ball into the goal defended by Valdes and the play is nullified. Just look at the non-conclusion of the Argentine to realize it. clarified this point, we can deepen and the set that, as happened in the expulsion of Pepe in the way, many have wanted to turn into nerve when the match seemed to revolve around which everything else: the lack, for some, and no need for others Cristiano to Mascherano.
Was it lack of Christian? "Pique is the one who does, previously missing from the Portuguese? In this case, is well marked a hypothetical law Advantage? What seems clear is that central Barcelona, \u200b\u200bGerard Pique, Cristiano Ronaldo is needed when it is moving towards the goal of Valdés. If the match referee, Frank De Bleeckere, had stated that violation, would not now controversial. The fact is that the referee noted that Belgian first offense and the play, therefore, continued.
result of the clash of Christian with Pique, the Portuguese lost the vertical falling just above the player who was about to control the ball, Javier Mascherano. It is true that Ronaldo did not intend to overthrow the jefecito, but the fact remains that without the overthrow (although unintended) the ball had not been frank to Higuain for it to try to beat Valdés. "The goal can not be because Mascherano knocks Christian," argued the former referee Mark Juan Andújar Oliver in TV. If De Bleeckere did not whistle the first non-Christian poke in order to apply the advantage rule, then the Belgian peer may be mistaken. Basically, because to implement this law the new situation that arises after the offense is not puff, would clearly be the team that has been the lack unmarked (and perhaps this is not the case.) In this play, the Madrid did not, apparently, a clear advantage after the fall of Ronaldo. And is that Mascherano was located between the Portuguese and the hypothetical final finisher of the rally, the Pipita Higuain. Jefecito If the balance had not lost by contact with Christian, would have some options to cut the ball. Consequently, if De Bleeckere said no Pique lack of a Christian with the intent to apply the advantage rule, you may be mistaken (and with that decision hurt the Madrid). If the Belgian
pita the first infrancción, Madrid has a puck very favorable to their interests (especially when you consider who shoots the faults, and how effectively, in all white). No honking the offense, De Bleeckere has no point other than the demolition of Mascherano at the hands of Christian. And this, even if unintentionally, Higuain stay motivated just to try to beat Valdés. Via
lavanguardia.com
,
abc.es
0 comments:
Post a Comment